Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Josh Olson's avatar

"potentially charging parents with child endangerment under state law to deter unsafe e-bike riding" is crazy. I don't know the tilt of the "Voice of OC" but it sounds like most parents are _against_ this change, but some of the board members are for it and want to make it sound like parents who aren't there tell them privately to ban the bikes.

Also goes towards the "e-bike" vs "e-moto" difference, where the boardmember is right to want to ban Razor crotch rocket knock-offs but wrong to want to ban a normal class 1 e-bike. Big difference, but people group them all the same.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?